Sunday, September 26, 2010

Lottery Millionaires - How Many People Win at Least a Million Dollars Every Year?

What do these people have in common: George Martinek, Susan Hannoun, Lori Boyle, Bernadette Gietka, Neal Wanless, and Bob Guerzon? Answer: They are all lottery millionaires. They, along with thousands of people every year, defy the odds and win the lotto jackpot. We hear about jackpot winners every week on the news. But have you ever considered how many new millionaires are created by the lottery each year? How many people win at least a million dollars?

According to the TLC television show, "The Lottery Changed My Life," more than 1600 new lottery millionaires are created each year. That doesn't include people that have won jackpots of, say, $100,000 because than the number would be much higher. Still, 1600 is quite a high number.

If 1600 win at least a million in the lotto every year, it means that there are more than 130 each month, more than 30 each week, and more than 4 each day. That's a lot of winners.

Perhaps you're inspired by these numbers. Perhaps you think that since there are so many big lottery winners, you're time will come one day. I don't mean to crash the party, but perhaps you should think again. The odds of winning a million dollar jackpot are bad. 1600 yearly jackpot winners isn't that big of a number when you consider how many people actually play. Hundreds of millions of people buy billions of lottery tickets each year and only a small fraction of those people actually win a big jackpot.

Don't get discouraged, though. The lottery is a game of random luck and you might get lucky one day and become a new lottery millionaire. Good luck!




Tino writes a blog about lottery winners. It includes stories about people that have won the lottery, people like Patriots instant lottery winner Scott Hoyt, who won $1 million.

Best Web Host and debt management

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Susan Boyle meghallgatása - magyar felirattal

A felvételről és a feliratról: A "Britain's Got Talent" (am "Britanniában van tehetség") című verseny harmadik évadjának méltán híressé vált részlete - általam készített magyar felirattal. Helyszín: Glasgow, Skócia (Egyesült Királyság). Dátum: 2009. április 11. Az említett brit televíziós műsort sokan "a brit Megasztár"-ként emlegetik, ami véleményem szerint téves analógia (bár még mindig pontosabb így nevezni, mint "az angol Megasztár"-nak), mivel ez a műsor nemcsak zenei tehetségeket keres. Bármilyen előadói produkcióval lehet jelentkezni. A fődíj 100.000 font és egy lehetőség a királyi család előtti fellépésre. Zsűri: - Simon Cowell író, színész, producer, a Syco tulajdonosa és a zsűri elnöke - Amanda Holden színésznő - Piers Morgan író, újságíró, televíziós személyiség Idézetek Simontól, aki többnyire elsőként nyomja meg a "Vége!" gombot: "Ismét, csak hogy egy kis lépést tegyünk vissza a valóságba: tudják, hogy mi azért keresgélünk, hátha megtaláljuk a következő David Copperfieldet, Michael Flatleyt, a következő Pavarottit - de ez szörnyű volt." "Ez egy gyönyörű dal, ha nem Ön énekli éppen." "Nagy-Britannia nevében nemmel szavazok." "Ez olyan volt, mintha egy kutya nyávogna!" "Maga egy undorító teremtmény!" "Konkurencia nélküli - ez annyira szörnyű volt, hogy leírhatatlan." "Igen, valóban a legjobb rész előtt nyomtam meg a gombot." "Tudja, szerintem maga teljesen őrült, de igent mondok." "Lányok, lehetek őszinte hozzátok? Ez az egyik legrosszabb együttes, amit valaha ...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KV8A_FErUVo&hl=en

bluefly asp web hosting

Friday, September 10, 2010

Reality TV - Is It Still Relevant?

Over the last decade or so, reality TV has kept people talking. Competitions like Pop Idol and The X Factor draw in millions of viewers, each supporting their favourites either by simply watching the show, or by watching the show and actively voting to keep their contestants in.

Reality shows can uncover talent and challenge stereotypes. One example is a lady called Susan Boyle, who took part in Britain's Got Talent. When she stepped onto the stage, the judges and the audience did not appear to be taking her seriously. They saw a woman of a certain age, who wasn't conventionally pretty, and they didn't think her capable of being a genuine contestant. All that changed when she began to sing. Susan Boyle is now known around the globe.

Critics say that shows like The X-Factor are manufactured moneymaking machines. It cannot be denied that the format plays on people's feelings (amongst others by showing stories of contestants' tragic pasts) and that, yes, there is a lot of money to be made. When people vote for their favourite to win, they will often purchase their first single. Votes, too, cost money. People are sold entertainment and some are willing to buy it in order to feel involved.

Fans of reality TV tend to be aware of its flaws and manipulation, and take the shows as they come. If a show's producers push it too far, they will speak up. When the British version of The X Factor was thought to have used auto-tuning in the production stages to make certain contestants sound better, it sparked an outrage and apologies had to be made.

One show that's caused some uproar in the past is Endemol's Big Brother. First shown in the Netherlands, Big Brother soon became popular around the world. The format was simple - stick a group of people in a fully monitored environment, set them some challenges and see what happens. Fans of the show can view the contestants around the clock and discover the ever-changing dynamics and interactions within the group.

Big Brother is currently in its final series on Channel 4 in the UK. There is a possibility that it may be picked up by another channel in the future. Several years ago, this UK series became controversial after racial tension between some of the housemates. Since then, Endemol and Channel 4 have been more careful with their format (too careful, according to a portion of its long-term fans), to avoid further outrage. This is understandable, as racism should never be tolerated. However, a lot of housemate interaction which would have been permissible in the past is no longer allowed.

Whilst some people see reality TV shows as an easy step into Z-list celebrity, and some would challenge the celebrity culture, the popularity of shows in this genre may have waned some, but they still draw a considerable amount of viewers. So what is it that people like about reality TV?

I think that everyone watches for their own reasons, from watching talented people and following their journey, to witnessing the developments of a group of people in a psychologically challenging environment. I also feel that one of the major factors is that these shows offer us the chance to watch people - ordinary people like us - follow their dreams or endure the ups and downs of their time on the show.

We like to spot people we can relate to. We like to imagine how we would have handled a situation, and see if our reactions are comparable to those of the people on our screen. And over time, we form a certain connection with the contestants, even though we're not likely to ever meet them. We start to feel like we know them, even a little, and we start to care about them.

This is the strength of reality TV, and for all its flaws and manipulation, its development is interesting. Whether or not it has a future is questionable - it shouldn't push the boundaries too far and turn vulgar, it shouldn't start to rely on the shock factor to draw an audience, nor should it turn so politically correct that it becomes patronizing and, well, dull. Program makers have their own challenge ahead to keep the format fresh, but if they can manage it, there should be some interesting years of entertainment ahead.




Kit Marsters is an author on http://www.Writing.Com/ which is a site for Creative Writing. She's also watched one too many series of Big Brother, though she's unlikely to stop.

Avis Car Rental mortgage loan